Below is my own comment that was submitted but (insert surprised look here) for some reason never published.
It's a little choppy because I was working under a size limitation.
Oh. Come. On. What next? Aliens?
2150 words and you can only show one viewpoint? And a remarkably silly one at that. Not one nay saying voice to point out the rather obvious flaws in the conspiracy mongers "evidence"? Like...
1)Steel beams do not have to totally liquefy before they become too weak to hold up one of the largest buildings on earth.
2)There were only 14 aircraft on duty across the US to provide interceptor duty that day.
3)Before 911 military aircraft did not have the authority to go full supersonic on intercept flights, almost all of which before 911 were aimed at aircraft entering the Us from overseas
3)Why would much be left of an aluminum aircraft full of jet fuel that crashed in to one of the largest masonry building in the world. A building that had just been modernized to stand up against truck bombs. Do you Brits remember how well your aluminum ships burned in the Falkland War?
4) Why wouldn't people be in the White House bunker? Was the White House a more obvious target than the US Capitol which is a much larger structure? Is the White House that inviting a target with the President not even in Washington.
And this massive Rube Goldberg conspiracy was carried out why? To incriminate Saudis so we could invade... Afghanistan?
For the Patriot Act?
Is that the best authoritarian legislation they could come up with after killing thousands?
So Bush could look Presidential....by reading a book... about a goat... to school children?
No comments:
Post a Comment